Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Moschos's avatar

Well written essay! I agree with your diagnosis, but I've come to believe there is an analytical need to engage in structural analysis of decision making processes and there is great practical risks for any big policy change if that hasnt been done. And respectfully, your analysis here may have ran into that risk, because your essay is that it treats these problems as failures of will, culture, or national priority rather than the deeper malign effects of changes to the deeper architecture of decision making itself. The Western nations you didnt decline because democracy “got in the way", that simply cannot be the case because we intensely de-democratized decades ago as over the course of the post WW2 decades our systems had replaced their formerly pluralistic, locally semi-sovereign, economically diversified, etc civic systems with highly centralized, hierarchical, continental-scale command structures, structures that cannot be repaired by simply changing policy direction or installing “strong national leadership”. Without rebuilding the underlying analytical, deliberative, and decision-making processes, regional financial organs, local economic discretion, publicly accessible civic channels, federated governance, etc., any proposed fix merely runs the same centralized machine with a different ideological script. Unless the institutional architecture changes, the outcomes will not.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?