Are you talking about ice cap stability.... no issue so far... And as the food supply continues to increase aided by more CO2 and Fossil fuels providing fertilizer we see no inability to not support present population growth.... that will tip back down .... if we create prosperity.
Some local adaption to changes in the variability of a warming climate will always be needed.. and we have the technology to manage this. Its certainly not an emergency that needs more than this.
Humans have been adapting to climate changes and extremes of weather for ever and the good news is we now have far better tools that in the past.
Its very clear that whole scale mitigation of any changes in climate is not only unnecessary, but will be in effective, and a waste of our wealth.
Putting population onto flood plains has always been a problem…. plus urbanization has made it worse with no planning for unnatural run off made worse by infrastructure growth.
I am not interested in anyone outside of my own nation when I have my own citizens living in tents.
As I already said the prime solution to improving adaption and population growth is a focus on prosperity to improve human flourishing .. then we can afford to fund adaption and population will self regulate.
Matey you must get a grip especially as you produce a Substack site on the subject that has many errors and your approach to facts puts you in the religious believer and not the science category.
I have already read your disinformation article and it falls way short in many ways.
First it did not argue with a single fact in the movie.. so the science and facts displayed still stand.
All you did was slander the individuals even though they are very qualified scientists and their ranks of climate realists are growing.
The argument that they are not climate scientists is ridicules ….it’s a new science and I would rather the related experience that these guys have gathered, than some new grad with some new climate science degree that has been indoctrinated by the alarmists and will comply with the climate emergency hoax just to stay employed and further a career.
Any technical person that is trained in data review and using IPCC and other approved data can see that we have no historical facts that support any climate emergency. Also, the science clearly declares that CO2 cannot be the main mechanism for any temperature increase.
Any emergency predictions and models from any source continues to be erroneous and shows that the future will not be an emergency. Its clear that the science is subjugated and we have the political cart way ahead of the scientific horse.
Try not to confuse weather with climate they are an order of magnitude 30 times different in time line.
Another thought is that as NetZero will be a huge imposition on the human race the burden of proof rests with the climate alarmists and so far based on the outlook all bets on the need for NetZero are off, and that will be what policy makers are beginning to construct ..hence my article.
I don’t mind a discussion with you on scientific facts, but by resisting a review of facts and slandering those that don’t agree with you is far from science.
Let’s avoid personal attacks. There I agree wholeheartedly with you. As to the climate. We know there are extreme weather events which have not been “reportedly seen” for generations. Unprecedented rainfall, sea level rising, drought et al. Are you denying our activity such as concentrated animal husbandry is irrelevant?
I have plenty of data from many sources that show that on every metric we don’t have any concerning trends that can be directed at a slightly and naturally warming planet.
If you are interested, I can direct you to these scientific facts.
Extreme weather is statically not increasing, and sea level rise is well inside our adaptability.
We as humans are affecting our environment via pollution and the best way to improve this situation is to improve prosperity as quickly as practical, and this will require the application of existing industrial mechanisms to improve human flourishing ….. including fossil fuels.
I don’t see how we need to worry about our approach to the farming industry, although I am happy to review data if that is your focus.
This film is disinformation at its best. The dopes denying climate change aren’t even climate scientists. I shredded this piece of junk. https://geoffreydeihl.substack.com/p/noxious-disinformation-climate-the
Have you re “ rising”? Elisabeth Rush. And yes I would love to see facts that prove we are not exceeding our limits to growth. Tks.
Are you talking about ice cap stability.... no issue so far... And as the food supply continues to increase aided by more CO2 and Fossil fuels providing fertilizer we see no inability to not support present population growth.... that will tip back down .... if we create prosperity.
Salt water is already encroaching on land inhabited by the poorest folk around San Fran bay. Have you seen the book?
Some local adaption to changes in the variability of a warming climate will always be needed.. and we have the technology to manage this. Its certainly not an emergency that needs more than this.
Humans have been adapting to climate changes and extremes of weather for ever and the good news is we now have far better tools that in the past.
Its very clear that whole scale mitigation of any changes in climate is not only unnecessary, but will be in effective, and a waste of our wealth.
How do these folk adapt though? No money. No insurance and home that floats every spring tide. I guess you know about Jakarta.
Putting population onto flood plains has always been a problem…. plus urbanization has made it worse with no planning for unnatural run off made worse by infrastructure growth.
I am not interested in anyone outside of my own nation when I have my own citizens living in tents.
As I already said the prime solution to improving adaption and population growth is a focus on prosperity to improve human flourishing .. then we can afford to fund adaption and population will self regulate.
I hope you have enough information from me on why Climate mitigation is a huge mistake… if you need specific info on that let me know…If I had to pick on article to review it would be this one… https://www.brainzmagazine.com/post/take-back-manufacturing-climate-realism
Matey you must get a grip especially as you produce a Substack site on the subject that has many errors and your approach to facts puts you in the religious believer and not the science category.
I have already read your disinformation article and it falls way short in many ways.
First it did not argue with a single fact in the movie.. so the science and facts displayed still stand.
All you did was slander the individuals even though they are very qualified scientists and their ranks of climate realists are growing.
The argument that they are not climate scientists is ridicules ….it’s a new science and I would rather the related experience that these guys have gathered, than some new grad with some new climate science degree that has been indoctrinated by the alarmists and will comply with the climate emergency hoax just to stay employed and further a career.
Any technical person that is trained in data review and using IPCC and other approved data can see that we have no historical facts that support any climate emergency. Also, the science clearly declares that CO2 cannot be the main mechanism for any temperature increase.
Any emergency predictions and models from any source continues to be erroneous and shows that the future will not be an emergency. Its clear that the science is subjugated and we have the political cart way ahead of the scientific horse.
Try not to confuse weather with climate they are an order of magnitude 30 times different in time line.
Another thought is that as NetZero will be a huge imposition on the human race the burden of proof rests with the climate alarmists and so far based on the outlook all bets on the need for NetZero are off, and that will be what policy makers are beginning to construct ..hence my article.
I don’t mind a discussion with you on scientific facts, but by resisting a review of facts and slandering those that don’t agree with you is far from science.
Let’s avoid personal attacks. There I agree wholeheartedly with you. As to the climate. We know there are extreme weather events which have not been “reportedly seen” for generations. Unprecedented rainfall, sea level rising, drought et al. Are you denying our activity such as concentrated animal husbandry is irrelevant?
Ok.. I am glad you want a civil conversation….
I have plenty of data from many sources that show that on every metric we don’t have any concerning trends that can be directed at a slightly and naturally warming planet.
If you are interested, I can direct you to these scientific facts.
Extreme weather is statically not increasing, and sea level rise is well inside our adaptability.
We as humans are affecting our environment via pollution and the best way to improve this situation is to improve prosperity as quickly as practical, and this will require the application of existing industrial mechanisms to improve human flourishing ….. including fossil fuels.
I don’t see how we need to worry about our approach to the farming industry, although I am happy to review data if that is your focus.