29 Comments
User's avatar
Rugnarldo's avatar

You're exposing your OWN COUNTRIES FRAUD WHICH YOU PUSHED ONTO US ALL🐍💩👹🇺🇲

Expand full comment
Rugnarldo's avatar

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO? BOMB ME?????🇺🇲👹💩

Expand full comment
Nigel Southway's avatar

No worse.. I am going to ignore you

Expand full comment
Rugnarldo's avatar

We didn't make mistakes, WE WERE HERDED. This historic FRAUD. Historic FRAUD calls for HISTORIC VITIATION AND HISTORIC REPARATION. You can F OFF with your satanic fkery america. It was YOU ALL THE TIME.... TERRORISTS. HISTORIC GLOBAL TERRORISTS

Expand full comment
Nigel Southway's avatar

I hope you feel better soon.

Expand full comment
Rugnarldo's avatar

You're just terrorists you evil satanic groomericunts.. FRAUDSTERS

Expand full comment
Rugnarldo's avatar

What kind of an apology is that. You're so evil.

Expand full comment
Nigel Southway's avatar

Listen sunshine I don't owe you anything let alone an apology... get off my site unless you have something constructive to say.

Expand full comment
Scott McKie's avatar

I sent it to you in your substack "reply" section.

Expand full comment
Scott McKie's avatar

Hi Nigel, WE've been down this road before. You only accept those facts that you agree with - which makes your piece only an opinion - as it does not reflect the complete picture.

Expand full comment
Nigel Southway's avatar

Well I suppose if I see a well substantiated fact I guess I have to follow it... the big question…. will better facts change my position. Yes of course..

Expand full comment
Lee Nicholson's avatar

"...national policies should only focus on planned adaptation to a slowly warming planet..." Such a valid insight, but it doesn't promote hysteria and isn't anti-human enough. I asked some when I was in Singapore (which has a lot of sea-captured land) lately, what they are going to do about sea level rise. They are increasing their dike levels from 3 meters to 4 meters -- and continuing on for $5 Billion allocated so far and $100 Billion total anticipated through 2100 -- without trying to change the entire climate of the Earth. This may or may not prove to be necessary if the 14 cm rise over 100 to 50 years (since 1920 or 1970 -- not clear which year is the real baseline -- but apparently accelerating) is the trend, but they at least have something to show for it (more very valuable land) and have adapted. Ironically, the green energy non-nuclear groups are advocating higher dependence on climate-related sources (wind and solar) while saying that the climate is becoming more unpredictable with wild swings and events.

Expand full comment
Nigel Southway's avatar

yep.. not much common sense with the green guys.

Expand full comment
Dave Stewart's avatar

In 60 years I have not seen any major changes in the Climate/Weather, some years are different to others, periods of drought and where I live 1 period of rain which lasted 3 years, I have to hand it to the Climate Alarmists, demonising something that no one can see, hey that's a good basis for starting a cult.

Expand full comment
Nigel Southway's avatar

Agreed

Expand full comment
Scott McKie's avatar

Mr. Southway -- this is your opinion only -- not fact - which you seem not to accept if yoy don't agree wiht it.

Expand full comment
Nigel Southway's avatar

Which part of my article is not fact.. please explain and suggest corrections.

Expand full comment